Days after twin earthquakes struck Venezuela, leaving thousands dead and causing widespread devastation across parts of the south American country, residents in the capital Caracas witnessed the sky turning an eerie blood red.
Table des matières
La dernière étude du célèbre biochimiste italien sur le vaccin à ARNm de Pfizer
LES VACCINS DE PANDORA – VIDÉO. Des nanoparticules toxiques à l’intérieur de jabs d’ARNm Covid dévoilés par le biochimiste Segalla
Dommages et violations de la sécurité sanitaire causés par la molécule fantôme
Plus de dangers liés à la trialkanolamine, un déstabilisateur du « sûr ADN cellulaire »
Un appel à l’action et un rappel immédiat pour « manquement grave à la sécurité »
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
La dernière étude du célèbre biochimiste italien sur le vaccin à ARNm de Pfizer
« ALC-0315, le lipide cationique ionisable permettant la plateforme LNP du vaccin de Pfizer Comirnaty, est présenté dans les dossiers réglementaires comme si son devenir métabolique était simple et bien contrôlé. Notre analyse identifie plutôt une divergence fondamentale et conséquente qui ne devrait jamais survivre à l’assemblage du dossier — sans parler de l’examen : le produit d’hydrolyse dicté par la structure chimique ALC-0315 est l’acide 2-hexyldécanoïque (α-ramifié), pourtant les principales soumissions de Pfizer invoquent à plusieurs reprises la présence d’un isomère 6-hexyldécanoïque distinct (non disponible sur le marché, non reconnu comme une norme analytique dans les protocoles analytiques établis). Il s’agit d’une identification erronée avec des conséquences directes sur la sécurité et la conformité ».
Dans ces quelques lignes initiales de sa dernière étude disruptive et révolutionnaire, nous comprenons qu’à cette occasion le biochimiste italien Gabriele Segalla s’est vraiment surpassé en révélant un instinct semblable à celui de Sherlock Holmes pour découvrir une nouvelle manipulation sensationnelle au sein du Covid-19.19 mRNA Comirnaty, le soi-disant « vaccin » produit par la société pharmaceutique new-yorkaise Pfizer, peut-être le plus utilisé dans le monde et certainement dans l’Union européenne.
Segalla vient de publier son quatrième article de recherche scientifique sur les produits expérimentaux anti-Covid de Pfizer (qui se sont révélés inefficaces selon une étude scientifique et très dangereux selon des centaines d’autres articles médicaux) et connaît donc bien les nanoparticules, qu’il a immédiatement défini comme « toxique » pour les humains, avec le risque, plus tard étayé par des dizaines d’autres études, de provoquer une inflammation musculaire, en particulier au niveau du cœur, telle que la myocardite ou la péricardite.
Un danger que les grandes entreprises pharmaceutiques Pfizer et Moderna elles-mêmes ont ensuite été contraintes d’inclure dans la notice par l’EMA (Agence européenne des médicaments).
La recherche a été publiée après une évaluation par les pairs dans le spécialiste américain International Journal of Vaccine, Theory, Practice, and Research le 18 mai (titre ALC-0315 Toxic Metabolites : Pharmacokinetic and Regulatory Criticalities in a COVID‐19 “mRNA Vaccine”, lien ici).
LES VACCINS DE PANDORA – VIDÉO. Des nanoparticules toxiques à l’intérieur de vaccins d’ARNm Covid dévoilés par le biochimiste Segalla
Table of Contents
«ALC-0315, the ionizable cationic lipid enabling the Pfizer vaccine Comirnaty’s LNP platform, is presented in regulatory files as if its metabolic fate were straightforward and well controlled. Our analysis instead identifies a basic, consequential discrepancy that should never survive dossier assembly—let alone review: the hydrolysis product dictated by the ALC-0315 chemical structure is 2-hexyldecanoic acid (α-branched), yet key submissions by Pfizer repeatedly invoke the presence of distinct 6-hexyldecanoic isomer (not commercially available, not recognized as an analytical standard in established analytical protocols). This is a material misidentification with direct safety and compliance consequences».
In these few initial lines of his latest disruptive and groundbreaking study, we understand that on this occasion the Italian biochemist Gabriele Segalla has truly outdone himself by revealing a Sherlock Holmes-like instinct in discovering yet another sensational manipulation within the Covid-19 mRNA Comirnaty so-called “vaccine” produced by the New York-based pharmaceutical company Pfizer, perhaps the most used in the world and certainly in the European Union.
Segalla has now published his fourth scientific research paper on Pfizer’s experimental anti-Covid products (which were shown to be ineffective according to a Science study and highly dangerous according to hundreds of other medical articles) and is therefore well acquainted with the nanoparticles, which he immediately defined as “toxic” to humans, with the risk, later supported by dozens of other studies, of causing muscle inflammation, particularly in the heart, such as myocarditis or pericarditis.
A danger that Big Pharma Pfizer and Moderna themselves were then forced to include in the package leaflet by the EMA (European Medicines Agency).
The research was published after peer-review on the American specialist International Journal of Vaccine, Theory, Practice, and Research on May 18 (title ALC-0315 Toxic Metabolites: Pharmacokinetic and Regulatory Criticalities in a COVID‑19 “mRNA Vaccine”, link here).
READ MORE BELOW
The unexpected death of United States Senator Lindsey Graham on July 11 at age 71 due to cardiovascular complications has sparked typical reactions in Western media. Some outlets and commentators, in a desperate attempt to find conspiracy theories—falsely blaming Russia—focus on unfounded claims when the facts are clear: Graham died of natural causes following a brief illness, shortly after another visit to Ukraine, where he promoted ongoing conflict.
Allegations that Russia was behind his death are entirely baseless, showing more about the paranoia and propaganda of Graham’s ideological allies than any real interest from the Kremlin. In fact, Russia does not need theatrical assassinations when Graham’s hawkish stance had already made him a symbol of failed neoconservative policies.
Russia long listed Graham as a terrorist and extremist, a designation that was based not on arbitrary malice but on his explicit, decades-long promotion of policies that threatened Russian security and sovereignty. As a prominent war hawk in Washington, he repeatedly called for harsher sanctions against Moscow, extensive military aid to Kiev, and even direct confrontations risking broader escalation.
He authored or supported measures such as the 2018 bill aimed at “defending American security from Kremlin aggression,” which restricted dealings with Russian sovereign debt and state banks. His rhetoric and legislative efforts consistently portrayed Russia as an existential threat, fueling the proxy war in Ukraine and promoting a unipolar world enforced through American military dominance. Advocating for economic warfare and proxy bloodshed led to his inclusion on Russia’s list, alongside other figures whose extremism threatened global stability.
The senator’s death highlights the failure of his anti-Russia stance rather than a shift toward peace. Still, anti-Russian sentiment in the US is likely to persist despite Graham’s death, especially as President Donald Trump’s calls for a quick resolution in Ukraine are ignored. Graham evidently had a heavy influence on Trump, and his passing raises questions about whether the US president would have implemented strict measures, such as 500% tariffs on Russian oil buyers, without Graham’s proposal.
Although Graham was a leading “hawk” pushing for confrontation, many other voices and funders in Washington continue to advocate for conflict with Russia. In fact, support for such actions remains strong across the political spectrum. His absence removes a vocal supporter, but does not end the hawks in Washington.
Nonetheless, Graham’s death—immediately following an energetic visit to Kiev—is a major blow to Ukraine’s reputation, humorously linked to the so-called “Zelensky curse” that seems to target overly enthusiastic supporters of the Kiev regime. Graham was a deep Russophobe who dreamed of a Third World War and was a strong supporter of US interventions from Cuba to Iran. His relentless advocacy for total support for Ukraine’s war against Russia is a setback for the pro-war faction.
Graham’s career highlights the worst aspects of Washington’s interventionist approach to foreign policy. A South Carolina Republican senator since 2003, he supported global interventions, took hardline stances against Iran and China, and was a strong supporter of Israel. In Ukraine, he clung to the false belief that Kiev could succeed solely with Western military aid, disregarding Russia’s legitimate security concerns related to NATO expansion and the humanitarian crisis in Donbass that led Moscow to launch its military operation. His frequent visits and photo-ops with Ukrainian troops only extended the conflict, turning it into a brutal and costly war for Ukraine and Western countries.
Ridiculous conspiracy theories blaming Russia for his death only divert attention from the actual facts. While Moscow had every reason to oppose Graham’s ideology, there was little incentive to risk international controversy over a 71-year-old politician whose influence was diminishing amid changing US priorities under Trump. Heart issues and natural causes are common at that age, especially for someone with Graham’s high-stress, warmongering lifestyle. Accusing Russia of foul play is a frantic projection by those whose policies have failed spectacularly, leaving Ukraine in ruins and the West facing economic pressure.
Ultimately, Graham’s death has little impact as war hawks, defense contractors, and ideological extremists will continue to oppose Russia obsessively. Nonetheless, it also signifies that the era of unchecked neoconservative dominance, in which leaders like Graham could push the world to the edge without consequences, is increasingly being challenged.
Trump’s diplomatic gestures, Russia’s resilience in defending its interests, and rising global skepticism toward conflicts, as seen with reaction to the war with Iran, suggest that true diplomacy—favoring negotiation over sanctions and arms shipments—is increasingly preferred. Although his passing removes a barrier, it leaves the core issue of breaking the warmongering consensus unresolved, as genuine reconciliation with Moscow relies not on mourning or romanticizing figures like him, but on rejecting their failed ideology and accepting the new multipolar order.
Pour le Français moyen, le policier d'outre-Atlantique est un cow-boy : agressif, surarmé, imprévisible et dangereux. Pourtant, selon Pierre Chaillot (et sa petite famille blanche), le choc du terrain est tout autre. À chaque fois que ma famille et moi avons été confrontés à une présence policière durant notre périple américain, raconte-t-il, nous avons été frappés par le calme, la courtoisie et la sérénité globale des agents. Un point de vue que ne partagerait peut-être pas tous les voyageurs et les Américains. Le flicage permanent de l'espace public français face à l'ouverture américaine s'expliquerait par la structure même de nos forces de l'ordre.
mise à jour le 14/07/26
L’anecdote la plus marquante s’est déroulée à New York, en plein cœur de la frénésie de la finale NBA gagnée par les Knicks. La foule était immense, l’ambiance électrique. Plusieurs rues étaient bloquées par des barrages filtrants. En France, un tel contexte populaire et de liesse est immédiatement synonyme de tension : on y déploie des compagnies de CRS ou de gendarmerie mobile en tenue de combat intégrale (les fameux « Robocops »), visages masqués par des visières fumées, boucliers au poing, gérant la foule à distance par la nasse, le gaz lacrymogène et l’intimidation physique.
À Manhattan, le spectacle était radicalement différent. Les très nombreux officiers du NYPD (la police de New York) étaient présents en uniforme classique, sans armure de guerre apparente. Ils se tenaient au milieu de la foule, accessibles, et orientaient les passants avec un calme et une politesse désarmante. Pas de postures de combat, pas de provocation.
Quelques jours plus tard, nous cherchions notre chemin au niveau de l’embarcadère du ferry gratuit de Staten Island — ce bateau massivement utilisé par les travailleurs pour se rendre à Manhattan et adoré par les touristes car il passe juste à côté de la Statue de la Liberté. Alors que nous hésitions sur la direction, une policière du NYPD s’est approchée de nous de manière totalement spontanée. Pas pour nous contrôler, pas pour nous observer avec suspicion, mais pour nous demander très courtoisement si nous avions besoin d’aide et nous orienter avec le sourire.
Sur les portières de sa voiture de patrouille, trois mots résumaient
cette posture : « Courtesy, Professionalism, Respect » (Courtoisie,
Professionnalisme, Respect). La courtoisie est écrite sur les véhicules
de police. En France, nous en sommes loin.
Pour comprendre cette inversion des rôles, il faut ouvrir la boîte noire institutionnelle.
La télévision française commet une erreur de méthode fondamentale : elle traite la police comme un bloc homogène. Or, l’organisation de la force publique révèle la nature profonde d’un État.
Le modèle français : L’empilement vertical et militarisé
En France, la quasi-totalité des forces de l’ordre dépend de l’État central (Ministère de l’Intérieur). Le citoyen local n’a aucun mot à dire sur leur gestion.
Le modèle américain : La fragmentation et la responsabilité locale
Aux États-Unis, il n’existe pas de « Police nationale ». Le paysage est éclaté en plus de 18 000 agences de police totalement indépendantes les unes des autres. Surtout, la loi interdit constitutionnellement à l’armée d’exercer des missions de police sur le sol national (*Posse Comitatus Act*).
Le Police Department (PD) : La police municipale (comme le NYPD). Elle ne dépend que du maire de la ville. Les policiers qui gèrent une manifestation ou orientent les touristes à l’embarcadère sont les mêmes qui patrouillent dans le quartier le lendemain. Ce sont des employés de la commune.
Le Sheriff’s Office (SO) : Dans la majorité des comtés américains (notamment dans le Wyoming), le Shérif n’est pas un fonctionnaire nommé par un préfet. Le Shérif est élu directement par les citoyens locaux. Ses adjoints (deputies) gèrent la sécurité de proximité.
Cette différence structurelle change absolument tout le rapport de force et le comportement de l’agent sur le terrain.
Un shérif américain ou un chef de police municipale sait que si ses hommes se comportent comme des cow-boys arrogants, s’ils brutalisent la population locale sans motif ou s’ils manquent de civisme au quotidien, le couperet tombera aux prochaines élections ou lors du vote du budget municipal par les résidents. La police américaine, par sa construction locale, est structurellement incitée à la désescalade et à la courtoisie avec la communauté qui la finance et l’élit.
En France, la trajectoire historique depuis le début des années 2000 a été inverse. La suppression méthodique de la police de proximité (l’îlotage) au profit d’une « politique du chiffre » et d’unités d’intervention rapides a brisé le lien social. Le policier français ne dépend pas du maire, ni des habitants du quartier qu’il patrouille. Il dépend uniquement du préfet et du ministre de l’Intérieur à Paris. L’équipement lourd (généralisation du LBD, des grenades de désencerclement, des armures lourdes) a transformé le gardien de la paix en un agent de protection du pouvoir central, de plus en plus coupé de la population
Cette déshumanisation institutionnelle se traduit par des faits mesurables et des rapports internationaux accablants sur la gestion des mouvements sociaux en France.
Après avoir cartographié ce labyrinthe institutionnel, il est indispensable de passer aux données brutes pour comprendre les forces en présence et, surtout, leur affectation. La télévision française commet souvent l’erreur méthodologique d’opposer une moyenne nationale à un fait divers local. Le statisticien, lui, regarde la répartition.
1. Le ratio policier/population : Un mythe persistant
Le premier réflexe statistique est de regarder le nombre de forces de l’ordre pour 100 000 habitants.
En France (Données Ministère de l’Intérieur) : Le ratio est d’environ
330 à 350 membres des forces de sécurité intérieure* (Police et
Gendarmerie cumulées) pour 100 000 habitants. C’est l’un des taux les
plus élevés en Europe de l’Ouest.
Aux États-Unis (Données FBI UCR / Bureau of Justice Statistics) :** Le
ratio national tourne autour de 240 à 250 officiers de police (toutes
agences locales et d’État confondues) pour 100 000 habitants.
Le premier fait scientifique est posé : la France est, toutes
proportions gardées, nettement plus fliquée que les États-Unis. Mais le
chiffre global cache une réalité structurelle majeure.
2. La mort de l’îlotage et du lien social
Le policier n’est pas qu’une force de coercition. C’est aussi, par essence, le lien social de proximité. Idéalement, le policier est un habitant de la ville où il travaille. Le statut de fonctionnaire au service des autres peut même servir de pont puissant pour l’intégration de populations défavorisées au sein de la communauté. C’est le concept d’*îlotage*.
Aux États-Unis : La décentralisation à outrance (les PD locaux) et l’élection des Shérifs maintiennent cette réalité. Les agents sont recrutés localement, habitent souvent la commune qu’ils patrouillent, et sont structurellement incités à la courtoisie avec leurs propres voisins et électeurs.
En France : Une succession de réformes depuis 20 ans a méthodiquement taillé dans ces effectifs de proximité. La suppression de la police de proximité au début des années 2000 a marqué la fin de cette doctrine du contact. On l’a remplacée par une logique d’intervention rapide par des unités projetées, coupées du tissu social local. Les forces de l’ordre ont souvent manifesté leur mécontentement face à cette perte de sens de leur métier. En réponse, le pouvoir central a distribué des primes et généralisé les armes de catégorie D (LBD, grenades de désencerclement), creusant — volontairement ou non — le fossé avec la population. Le verdict de la répartition est sans appel : les USA ont moins de policiers, mais ils sont massés dans le quotidien de leur communauté. La France a plus de forces, mais elles sont concentrées dans la surveillance verticale et le maintien de l’ordre face à sa propre population.
A suivre sur le site de Pierre Chaillot.
par Jacqueline
Il manque des vidéos qui ne se chargent pas . Voir par le lien en anglais
Table of Contents
by Carlo Domenico Cristofori
Days after twin earthquakes struck Venezuela, leaving thousands dead and causing widespread devastation across parts of the south American country, residents in the capital Caracas witnessed the sky turning an eerie blood red.
Videos quickly spread over social media, showing a burning crimson sky as the sun sank below the horizon, bathing the city in a red glow.
Now let’s try to analyze the possible causes from a natural, scientific, and metaphysical perspective.
It would be a mistake, in fact, to ignore potentially supernatural or geoengineered phenomena simply because we persist in confining these areas to a corner where science, unfortunately, still lacks certain and empirically unequivocal answers.
It’s important to note that a video published by the New York Post showed the sky changing in color from deep red to purple, just like the multi-colored auroras triggered by the HARRP station often used by US Pentagon for geoengineering military tests.

Fabio is investigative journalist since 1991. Now geopolitics, intelligence, military, SARS-Cov-2 manmade, NWO expert and Director-founder of Gospa News: a Christian Information Journal.
His articles were published on many international media and website as SouthFront, Reseau International, Sputnik Italia, United Nation Association Westminster, Global Research, Kolozeg and more…
Most popolar investigation on VT is:
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio, born on 24/2/1967 in Borgosesia, started working as a reporter when he was only 19 years old in the alpine area of Valsesia, Piedmont, his birth region in Italy. After studying literature and history at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, he became director of the local newspaper Notizia Oggi Vercelli and specialized in judicial reporting.
For about 15 years he is a correspondent from Northern Italy for the Italian newspapers Libero and Il Giornale, also writing important revelations on the Ustica massacre, a report on Freemasonry and organized crime.
With independent investigations, he collaborates with Carabinieri and Guardia di Finanza in important investigations that conclude with the arrest of Camorra entrepreneurs or corrupt politicians.
In July 2018 he found the counter-information web media Gospa News focused on geopolitics, terrorism, Middle East, and military intelligence.
In 2020 published the book, in Italian only, WUHAN-GATES – The New World Order Plot on SARS-Cov-2 manmade focused on the cycle of investigations Wuhan-Gates
His investigations was quoted also by The Gateway Pundit, Tasnim and others
He worked for many years for the magazine Art & Wine as an art critic and curator.
Certaines illustrations et vidéos semblent ne pas apparaitre. Voir avec le lien ci-dessous
Gordon: “I have worked at the pinnacle of America's security apparatus for decades. At times, directly for presidents. We always knew about Epstein.
By Gordon Duff
Former UN Diplomat, Vietnam Combat US Veteran and former Intelligence Advisor at Munich Security Conference (MSC), The Intel Drop founder
Analysis sent by Gordon to Fabio G.C. Carisio, director of Gospa News International and columnist on VT, with a request for dissemination
Originally posted on March, 20
All links to previous Gospa News posts or videos have been added in the aftermath by virtue of the ties with coverede topics

Let me tell you how empires really work.
They do not work through policy papers. They do not work through diplomatic cables or National Security Council memos. Those are the decorations on the wall. The engine of empire runs on something older, something darker, something that requires private islands and soundproof rooms and children who will never grow up to testify.
I learned this slowly. Vietnam taught me that governments lie. Iraq taught me that they kill for oil. But Iran is teaching me something worse: they kill for secrets.
They kill to keep the photographs hidden. They kill to protect the ceremonies. They kill so that the men on the islands can sleep knowing their shame is buried under other people’s graves.
Look at the war on Iran through normal eyes and it is madness.
Iran has not attacked America. Iran has no nuclear weapons. Iran’s military is defensive, designed to hold the Strait of Hormuz and little more. The sanctions have already crippled its economy. The assassination campaign has already killed its scientists. There is no rational reason to invade.
So why are we doing it?
Because the reasons are not rational. They are occult.
The word comes from Latin. It means hidden. The reasons for this war are hidden. They are buried in files that courts have sealed. They are buried on islands where powerful men gather to consume what should never be consumed. They are buried in the blood of children whose only crime was being available.
I have worked at the pinnacle of America’s security apparatus for decades. At times, directly for presidents. I sat in rooms where the world was divided and redivided. I heard the briefings. I saw the files that never reach the public.
We always knew about Epstein. We always knew about Maxwell. We always knew about the Murdoch organization and how it laundered reputations while trafficking in filth. It was not a secret among those who needed to know. It was an open secret, the kind that everyone carries but no one speaks.
And we chose—I chose, along with the rest—to tell ourselves: they would never go that far.
We told ourselves that human depravity has limits. We told ourselves that power has boundaries. We told ourselves that the men in the photographs, the men at the dinners, the men on the islands, would stop at something short of the absolute abyss.
We were wrong.
They went as far as they could. And there was no limit. There is no limit to who they could control. There is no limit to what human weakness and depravity can sink to. The men who run this empire are not just corrupt. They are consumed. They have crossed lines so fundamental that the only way to keep standing is to keep crossing.
The Epstein files are not about sex. They are about control through horror. Once you have participated, once you have been photographed, once you have been initiated into the ceremonies, you belong forever. You will vote for any war. You will send any number of soldiers to die. You will burn any country to keep the flames away from your own door.
Jeffrey Epstein did not kill himself. That is not a joke anymore. It is a thesis statement.
Epstein built an architecture. Not just a trafficking ring. An architecture of control. He found that the most powerful men in the world—presidents, princes, senators, billionaires—could be owned if you had the right photographs. Not photographs of adultery. Those are common. Photographs of sacrifice. Photographs of ritual. Photographs of things so far outside human decency that exposure means not just ruin but recognition of what they truly are.
Donald Trump is in those photographs. So are many others. They are being blackmailed not for sex but for evil. The kind of evil that requires ceremonies. The kind of evil that requires children. The kind of evil that happens at private hunting clubs and Palm Beach brothels and islands with no extradition treaties.
And the price of keeping those photographs hidden is American foreign policy.
Let us speak plainly about Israel.
Israel is not America’s ally. America is Israel’s asset. The relationship is not partnership. It is ownership. Through AIPAC and its network of billionaires, Israel purchased the United States Congress decades ago. Both parties. Every committee. Every relevant senator. The checks clear within hours. The loyalty is absolute.
But even that was not enough. Money buys votes. It does not buy souls. For that, you need the Epstein architecture. You need the photographs. You need the leverage that turns a president into a puppet and a Congress into a chorus.
The billionaires who own Congress are the same billionaires who visited the island. The same billionaires who funded Epstein. The same billionaires who now demand war with Iran because Iran is the one country in the region that refuses to kneel to Tel Aviv.
Israel wants Iran destroyed. Israel has always wanted Iran destroyed. And now Israel has the leverage to make it happen. The compromised American president will do as he is told. The compromised American Congress will vote as they are told. The compromised American media will lie as they are told.
And American children will die for Israeli objectives while the photographs stay sealed.
I am not a religious man. I do not use words like “occult” lightly. But I have lived long enough to recognize when something is not just criminal but ceremonial.
The Epstein case revealed a network. But the network was not just for sex. Sex is common. Sex is cheap. What happened on that island was ritual. It had structure. It had purpose. It had the kind of organization that suggests not just depravity but theology.
There is a sickness at the heart of the American elite. It is a sickness that requires blood. It is a sickness that requires children. It is a sickness that has been passed down through generations, hidden behind philanthropy and political donations and the careful construction of respectable images.
These people do not just want power. They want transgression. They want to cross lines so fundamentally that crossing them becomes the source of their power over each other. Once you have participated in the ritual, once you have been photographed in the ceremony, you are owned forever. You can never speak. You can never resist. You will vote for any war. You will send any number of soldiers to die. You will do anything to keep the photographs from seeing daylight.

Here is the irony that would be funny if it were not fatal.
The United States was founded on the idea that no man is above the law. Today, the men above the law are the ones making the laws. They send others to die while they gather on islands. They speak of family values while participating in rituals that destroy families. They wrap themselves in flags and scriptures while serving a foreign power and a private sickness.
The Christian Zionists who demand war with Iran because it protects Israel? Many of them are in the photographs. Their piety is performance. Their real religion happens elsewhere.
The billionaires who fund both political parties? They are in the
photographs. Their donations are protection money. Their philanthropy is
reputation laundering.
The president who tweets about American greatness? He is in the
photographs. His rage is the rage of the trapped. His wars are the wars
of the blackmailed.
We are the sacrifice.
The American people have been stripped of everything. Our jobs are gone. Our wages are flat. Our healthcare is a racket. Our democracy is an auction. And now our children are being shipped to die so that powerful men can keep their secrets.
The kids from Ohio and Kansas and Texas do not know they are dying for the Epstein files. They think they are defending freedom. They think they are fighting terrorism. They do not know that the real terrorists are in Washington and Tel Aviv and on the islands, watching from screens while the missiles fly.
They are cannon fodder for a war that serves no American interest. They are human sacrifices for a religion they do not practice. They are blood offerings to keep the photographs buried.
Under international law, Iran has every right to defend itself. But international law is a joke. The powerful cite it when convenient and ignore it when not.
Iran will defend itself anyway. The Axis of Resistance will move. The straits will burn. The bases will burn. American ships will sink. American soldiers will die. Iranian soldiers will die. Civilians will die. The region will burn.
And for what?
For the secrets of dead children. For the photographs of living monsters. For the rituals that continue on private islands while the world burns. For the occult sickness that demands blood to stay hidden.
If you are reading this and you are American, ask yourself: why are we doing this? What possible American interest is served by war with Iran?
The answer is none. The interest served is Israeli. The interest served is the billionaires’. The interest served is the blackmailers’. The interest served is the occult core that runs this empire from the shadows.
We are slaves. We have been slaves for longer than we know. And now we are being asked to die for our masters’ secrets.

The future is blood. American blood. Iranian blood. Innocent blood. The ports will burn. The cities will burn. The children will burn.
And on the islands, in the clubs, in the sealed courtrooms where the files gather dust, the men who ordered this will watch. They will feel nothing. They will pour another drink.
They will plan the next ritual.
But history is watching. History remembers. And when the slaves finally wake, when the photographs finally see daylight, when the truth finally becomes undeniable, the judgment will come.

It will not be kind to the murderers of leaders. It will not be kind to the blackmailers of presidents. It will not be kind to the desecrators of children. It will not be kind to the empires that send their slaves to die for the secrets of the damned.
The thread holds. The truth spreads. And empires, in the end, always fall.
By Gordon Duff
Former UN Diplomat, Vietnam Combat US Veteran and former Intelligence Advisor at Munich Security Conference (MSC), The Intel Drop founder
RELATED POSTS

Fabio is investigative journalist since 1991. Now geopolitics, intelligence, military, SARS-Cov-2 manmade, NWO expert and Director-founder of Gospa News: a Christian Information Journal.
His articles were published on many international media and website as SouthFront, Reseau International, Sputnik Italia, United Nation Association Westminster, Global Research, Kolozeg and more…
Most popolar investigation on VT is:
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio, born on 24/2/1967 in Borgosesia, started working as a reporter when he was only 19 years old in the alpine area of Valsesia, Piedmont, his birth region in Italy. After studying literature and history at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Milan, he became director of the local newspaper Notizia Oggi Vercelli and specialized in judicial reporting.
For about 15 years he is a correspondent from Northern Italy for the Italian newspapers Libero and Il Giornale, also writing important revelations on the Ustica massacre, a report on Freemasonry and organized crime.
With independent investigations, he collaborates with Carabinieri and Guardia di Finanza in important investigations that conclude with the arrest of Camorra entrepreneurs or corrupt politicians.
In July 2018 he found the counter-information web media Gospa News focused on geopolitics, terrorism, Middle East, and military intelligence.
In 2020 published the book, in Italian only, WUHAN-GATES – The New World Order Plot on SARS-Cov-2 manmade focused on the cycle of investigations Wuhan-Gates
His investigations was quoted also by The Gateway Pundit, Tasnim and others
He worked for many years for the magazine Art & Wine as an art critic and curator.